Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We validated AnthropoAge, a biological age (BA) metric, for prediction of mortality and age-related outcomes using harmonized data from the US, England, Mexico, Costa Rica, and China. We estimated AnthropoAge and AnthropoAgeAccel as proxies of BA and age acceleration using body mass index and waist-to-height ratio. We compared mortality prediction of AnthropoAge vs. chronological age (CA) using Cox models and assessed its association with age-related outcomes with generalized estimating equations. Among 57,080 participants aged 50-94 years, AnthropoAgeAccel (c-statistic 0.806) improved mortality prediction of CA (0.803) and identified distinct aging trends for each country. Accelerated aging (AnthropoAgeAccel>0) increased mortality risk by ~37% independently of age and covariates, and predicted health deterioration, new deficits in activities of daily living, and age-related diseases. AnthropoAge is a robust BA metric with potential applications in identifying functional deficits, health decline, and mortality risk. However, it requires further validation and potential recalibration for broader applicability in underrepresented populations like Latin America.

Original publication

DOI

10.1038/s41514-025-00232-1

Type

Journal article

Journal

NPJ Aging

Publication Date

21/06/2025

Volume

11