Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit

CTSU

Introduction and methods sections reproduced from: Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, "Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. Volume 1. Worldwide Evidence 1985-1990"

Oxford University Press 1990

Disclaimer: The following was reproduced using optical character recognition software. Every effort has been made to ensure that the text has been reproduced correctly. We apologise for any errors which may remain.

3. INTRODUCTION

3.1Systematic public availability of randomized trial results
3.2Informative overviews even of somewhat different trials, despite heterogeneity of design and of size of treatment effect
3.3Importance of reliably assessing MODERATE treatment effects
3.4Two main reasons for using overviews of properly randomized trials to assess MODERATE treatment effects: avoiding selection biases and reducing random errors
3.5Review of many trials, with no data-dependent omissions, to limit selection bias in assessment of treatment effects
3.6Other selection biases either in design or in analysis of trials
3.7Proper randomization (with no subsequent exclusions) to limit selection bias in design of trials of moderate treatment effects
3.8Selection biases from subgroup analyses: statistical difficulty in the assessment of qualitative "interactions" and of quantitative "interactions"
3.9Specific categories of patient or of treatment: data-dependent emphasis on subgroup analyses versus indirect extrapolation of overall analyses
3.10Use of recurrence data, as well as mortality data, to study interactions unbiasedly
3.11Use of overviews to assess effects of treatment on other specific causes of early death, or other rare endpoints
3.12Use of overviews to improve the reliability of data from particular trials

4. DATA COLLECTION METHODS

4.1Summary of the inclusion criteria for trials in the present overviews
4.2Principles of identification of trials: selection bias may be limited even without absolute completeness
4.3Practice of identification of trials: multiple sources of information
4.4Methods of seeking data from individual trials
4.5Methods of checking data from individual trials
4.6Methods of publishing data from individual trials

5. STATISTICAL METHODS

5.1Medical assumptions: (1) modest sizes of treatment effects, and (2) differences of size but not of direction between effects in different circumstances
5.2Comparisons only of like with like, based on "Observed minus Expected" (O-E) differences in each separate trial
5.3Routine stratification of all main analyses by age (<50, 50+) and by year (1, 2, 3, 4, 5+) of follow-up
5.4Additional stratification of selected analyses for the available information on nodal status or Estrogen Receptor status
5.5Arithmetic procedures for calculation of Observed minus Expected (O-E) numbers of events among treatment-allocated patients, and for obtaining "two-sided" significance levels ( 2 P )
5.6Interpretation of P-values: statistical significance and medical judgement
5.7RESULTS OF RADIOTHERAPY TRIALS as an example of the summation of (O-E) values from different trials to provide an overall test of the "null hypothesis" of no treatment effect
5.8Use of (O-E) values to provide a description of the typical reduction in the odds of treatment failure (i.e. to describe the "alternative hypothesis")
5.9Graphical display methods for separate trial results, and for an overview
5.10Similarities between risk ratios, death rate ratios and odds ratios when event rates are low
5.11Logrank "year of death" analyses for statistical significance tests, and for estimation of reductions in annual odds of death
5.12Life-table estimation for descriptive purposes
5.13Test of heterogeneity between several different trial results
5.14Arithmetic details of tests for trend, for heterogeneity and for interaction
5.15Practical meaning of a clear effect of treatment in a single large trial
5.16Practical meaning of a clear effect of treatment in an overview of many trials
5.17Fixed-effect "assumption-free" methods, and random-effect "assumed representativeness" methods

REFERENCES

Back to main page.

Last modified 19-02-2008 01:49 PM

Previous Section

Current Section